The intention of No Child Left Behind was to improve test scores for America’s children and in doing so, improving how our kids do in school. The tests are mainly geared to test student proficiency in reading and math, usually in a multiple choice, timed format. Unfortunately, this has resulted in many schools teaching to the test instead of teaching the curriculum.
Many schools receive funding based on standardized testing scores. Teachers may be fired if their students do not perform well on their tests. This has led to increased pressure on teachers teaching the subject matter students will find on the test. Some teachers have cut certain aspects of the curriculum if they know something may not be on the test. Teaching for the test can also hinder critical thinking skills and creativity, as many students are expected to learn just the facts.
Another issue with standardized testing is that many students have trouble in these test-taking environments. Tests are timed and in a controlled situation. Students who may not have English as their first language are held to the same standards as native speakers. Students may not show their true potential or intelligence on these tests.
In a positive light, teachers are more accountable for their students achievement. Tests are objective and scored accordingly. These tests also allow teachers to easily identify students who may need extra help. But while students may do well on the test, are they really learning?
It still may take years to see if No Child Left Behind really works. Teachers, parents, and administrators continue to debate its effectiveness. While teachers work harder to prepare students for the tests, they must not leave out the other subjects that are so valuable to a child’s education, such as art, physical education, social studies, and science.